Hot! No Child Left Behind Act

No Child Left Behind Act involving 2001Full title An work to help close that good results space having accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that will zero youngster is actually left behind. Acronym NCLB Enacted because of the 107th United States Congress Effective January 8, 2002 Citations Public Law 107-110 30 Stat. 750, 42 Stat. 108, 48 Stat. 986, 52 Stat. 781, 73 Stat. 4, 88 Stat. 2213, 102 Stat. 130 as well as 357, 107 Stat. 1510, 108 Stat. 154 in addition to 223, 112 Stat. 3076, 113 Stat. 1323, 115 Stat. 1425 in order to 2094 Codification Act(s) amended Adult Education in addition to Family Literacy Act Age Discrimination Act regarding 1975 Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Act regarding 1994 Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Amendments of 1988 Carl D. Perkins Vocational in addition to Technical Education Act of 1998 Civil Rights Act involving 1964 Communications Act of 1934 Community Services Block Grant Act Department of Education Organization Act District associated with Columbia College Access Act regarding 1999 Education Amendments associated with 1972 Education Amendments connected with 1978 Education Flexibility Partnership Act of 1999 Education pertaining to Economic Security Act Educational Research, Development, Dissemination, and Improvement Act involving 1994 Elementary plus Secondary Education Act regarding 1965 Family in addition to Medical Leave Act connected with 1993 General Education Provisions Act Goals 2000: Educate America Act Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments involving 1984 Higher Education Act of 1965 Individuals together with Disabilities Education Act James Madison Memorial Fellowship Act Internal Revenue Code regarding 1986 Johnson-O'Malley Act with 1934 Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1997 McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act associated with 1987 Museum in addition to Library Services Act National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act regarding 1977 National as well as Community Service Act involving 1990 National Child Protection Act with 1993 National Education Statistics Act regarding 1994 National Environmental Education Act involving 1990 Native American Languages Act Public Law 88-210 Public Law 106-400 Refugee Education Assistance Act connected with 1980

Safe Drinking Water Act School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994 State Dependent Care Development Grants Act

Major amendments Relevant Supreme Court cases None Legislative record Provisions on the act Effects with teachers, schools, plus college areas Increased obligation School selection Public understanding regarding public education and learning Effects about college student diagnosis Improved analyze scores Problems along with standardized tests Effects on programs as well as models Improvement over area criteria Quality of education Effect about arts along with electives Limitations about local command Effects with gifted, talented, and high-performing pupils Effects on low-performing pupils and students having disabilities Incentives next to low-performing students Unrealistic objectives "Gaming" the actual system Variability with student potential in addition to 100% compliance Effects with racial along with cultural minority students Attention to minority populations State refusal to form non-English examination Increases segregation around open public universities Funding State education costs Proposals pertaining to reform See as well References

, 115 1425, ratified January 8, 2002.

. Library connected with Congress . Retrieved 2008-09-16.

U.S. Department associated with Education. , 2006-02-06. Retrieved on 2008-06-05.

. clerk.house.gov. May 23, 2001. Retrieved 2008-04-28

Senate rotate contact vote

Dillon, Erin & Rotherham, Andy. . Retrieved August 19, 2009.

^ Scientifically Based Research. ERIC Clearinghouse about Educational Management. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Educational Evaluation along with Policy Analysis 24,no.4 (Winter 2002):305 331, plus Eric A. Hanushek and Margaret E. Raymond, "Does education accountability cause improved pupil performance?" Journal regarding Policy Analysis and Management 24,no.2 (Spring 2005):297-327.

Center on Education Policy, Answering that Question That Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased Since No Child Left Behind ? Washington: Center upon Education Policy, June 2007).

List associated with articles relating to NCLB debate

No Child Left Behind Act Is Working Department involving Education. Retrieved 6/7/07.

Linda Perlstein, Tested

High-Stakes Assessments throughout Reading . International Reading Association. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Learning about Teaching: Initial Findings from your Measuring Effective Teaching Program . Bill along with Melinda Gates Foundation. December 2010

ISBN 978-1-4166-0035-0 . p. 42 43

Cohen, L. G. & Spenciner, L. J. (2007). Assessment regarding kids & youngsters with particular needs. (3rd edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.

. National Education Association. August 2, 2006. Retrieved 2008-04-28

(nd) FairTest.org. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Carey, Kevin (24 May 2011). "Growth Models plus Accountability: A Recipe with regard to Remaking ESEA". Education Sector.

New review realises great dissimilarities in point out goals to get educational proficiency underneath NCLB . South Carolina Department associated with Education. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Congress To Weigh ' No Child Left Behind ' . Washington Post. Retrieved November 13, 2011.

Mapping 2006 state proficiency standards onto that NAEP machines . NCES 2007-482. National Center with regard to Education Statistics. June 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-08.

Mizell, H (2003). .

. New York State Education Agency. 2005. Retrieved 2007-06-07.

.

, additional text.

Beveridge, T. (2010). No Child Left Behind as well as Fine Arts Classes. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1), 4 7. doi:10.1080/10632910903228090.

Grey, A. (2010). No Child Left Behind around Art Education Policy: A Review associated with Key Recommendations intended for Arts Language Revisions. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1), 8 15. doi:10.1080/10632910903228132.

Pederson, P. (2007). What Is Measured Is Treasured: The Impact of the particular No Child Left Behind Act on Nonassessed Subjects. Clearing House, 80(6), 287 291. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database

Reville, Paul (October 2007). "Stop the actual Narrowing with the Curriculum By Right-Sizing School Time". Education Week twenty-four (Academic Search Premier. EBSCO.Web).

Holland, R. (2004) . School Reform News. March 1, 2004. The Heartland Institute. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

^ Cloud, John. coming from Time, July 27, 2007, pp forty five 46. Retrieved April 6, 2009.

(nd) . SusanOhanian.org. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

.Retrieved August 12, 2010.

Marler, David (2011). St. Louis Public Schools.

Moore, Kelly (2011). Communication Arts Chairman.

(2004) . FactCheck.org. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Haney, W. (nd) . Center with the Study of Testing, Evaluation plus Education Policy. Lynch School connected with Education. Boston College. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

EdAccountability.org website.

. Retrieved 2008-03-06.

. Archived out of on 2008-02-11. Retrieved 2008-03-06.

Harper, Liz. No Child Left Behind s Impact on Specialized Education . Online NewsHour. August 21, 2005. pbs.org/newshour. twenty February 2009.

^ . U.S. Department regarding Education. Retrieved 2008-04-09.

No Child Left Behind: Misguided Approach to be able to School Accountability regarding English Language Learners . National Association pertaining to Bilingual Education. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Children verts Defense Fund (2005). State associated with America s Children, 2005. Children azines Defense Fund.

^ Knaus, Christopher. (2007). Still Segregated Still Unequal: Analyzing the Impact regarding No Child Left Behind on African American Students. University connected with California, Berkley: National Urban League.

U.S. Department connected with Education: The Condition associated with Education 2006.

Owens, A., & Sunderman, G. L. (2006). School Accountability below NCLB: Aid or maybe Obstacle pertaining to Measuring Racial Equity? Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.

^ U.S. Department with Education, Elementary and Secondary Education Act Budget Table. 2006. 7 April 2009.

.

Leaving No Child Left Behind: States costed by using enacting ersus national knowledge prepare balk in the cost connected with compliance. The American Conservative. Retrieved 6/7/07.

FactCheck . 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-29.

(nd) . American Federation regarding Teachers. Retrieved 6/7/07.

Center to get American Progress .

^ U.S. Department of Education, Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Proposal .

National Center with regard to Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics 2007.

^

Monitor Overview

dead hyperlink ]

. Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA). Retrieved 2008-07-06

. US Department of Education. Retrieved 2009-02-23

NCLB fulfills college realities: classes with the industry . Corwin Press. p. 10. ISBN 1412915554 .

. 2004-10-21. Retrieved 2008-01-03.

NCLB: 'Too Destructive that will Salvage' , USA Today, May 31, 2007. Retrieved 6/7/07.

Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the Promise that will Our Nation's Children , February, 2007. Retrieved 6/8/07.

. Retrieved 2008-01-03.

Weinstein, A. , Education.com, Inc. (2006).

Dillon, Sam. The New York Times. http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/no_child_left_behind_act/index.html?scp=1&sq=NCLB&st=cse .

Lowe, R. and Kantor, H. (2006). From New Deal that will No Deal: No Child Left Behind Act plus the Devolution connected with Responsibility pertaining to Equal Opportunity. 76:4. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Educational Review.

Lohman, J. , OLR Research Report (4 June 2010).

Russell Chaddock, G. , The Christian Science Monitor . (2010).

Ravitch, D. , Virginia Journal connected with Education . (November 2010).

Government Interest communities